Sabrina59 wrote:wiseguy wrote:Sabrina59 wrote:I still have to agree with Gregory on this subject. I do not insert new singers between old singers. New singers go to the back of the rotation, period.
As a singer, I like to know who I am following. As a KJ, I like my singers to know who they are following. It cuts down on the amount of times I am asked how soon until they are up.
I think the big difference here is the size of the rotations. My little show has grown to an average of about 18 singers a night. If I am just starting a new rotation, and someone puts a slip up, even if I put them at the end they don't have long to wait. From the sounds of it, Gregory frequents a small show as well.
If i had 30 or 40 people in the rotation I might consider using the "insertion" method as well. But the way I do it works well for me. I've only had folks inserted in front of me a couple of times, and, I must say, I didn't like it.
18 songs, at the four minute per song average, is an hour and twelve minutes.
It's three hours into a four hour show. You have 18 singers, that by this time, have all sang at least twice. Two people come in, order a drink, and turn in song requests. From what you have stated here these singers would not be allowed to sing.
This is not acceptable to me.
Perhaps I am in a unique position, wiseguy. We are more like family that gets together for a fun-filled evening.
My show starts at 6 and ends after 9. I end the show at the end of a rotation. So, in your example, yes, those singers would sing their song.
I am not convinced that there is a right way and a wrong way to do the rotation as long as you are fair and consistent. The way I do it works very well for me, the way you do it works well for you.
What is your definition of fair, because that seems to be the sticking point?
FAIR..... marked by impartiality and honesty : free from self-interest, prejudice, or favoritism <a very fair person to do business with> b (1) : conforming with the established rules : allowed (2) : consonant with merit or importance : due <a fair share> c : open to legitimate pursuit, attack, or ridicule <fair game>
Whether it's your family or friends, you think your rotation system is fair. I think mine is fair. Wiseguy thinks his is fair.
How come some singers don't think they are fair????
There are many KJs that are anything but fair. Their friends like them because they are the recipiants of their favoritism. Other singers that get deliberately mistreated don't find them fair. They are consistantly unfair. Making any singer wait 2 entire rotations before they sing one song is unfair. It happened to me. I would never do that to any singer. Friend or foe. Even if it was my KJ competition. Everyone gets the same from me.
Bigdog... you keep trying to justify yourself and how you run your shows by applying generalities to a specific situation.
You asked me several time whether or not I thought the way you run your shows is fair. I didn't answer before, but I will now. No, I don't. I think you're trying to justify the fact that that you're a petty tyrant who doesn't like the people who sing in your shows, to tell you the truth.
You're right about one thing though. It's not just about one person. It's not just about you.
It's about me doing what is fair for all to accomplish the reason I was hired. To take care of the paying customers. To facilitate and provide music and lyrics for the people that want to sing. Make money for the bar. Attract more people to the bar. Keep everyone there ..there and buying. That's about me. It's my job. It's my responsibility. I take it personal. Taking care of the majority of the crowd. That includes the whiners and complainers to a certain point. I'm not there for them.
They are not going to disrupt and detract from what I have to do during the entire night. That is to put on a top quality professional karaoke show. Not babysit and change diapers. It's to help each singer be the best they can by doing what I do best. Yeah it's all about me. My goal for the evening. I succeed every night. No complainer is going to stop me or slow me down or keep me from fulfilling my commitment and my obligation. It's not about the cronic complainer.
Take it to someone that cares because I don't and I'm not getting paid enough by anyone to care that much. My show will not suffer from it. You are right I am totally about me. Nobody can or will hijack my show because it's bigger than you and your imaginary wants and needs. I'm the Emcee. I'm in charge. I'm responsible. It's not the singers show, it's mine. It's not the nonsingers show, it's mine. It's not the bar owners show, it's mine. I'm number 1 all the time. KJs that let ANYONE dictate how they think the show should run will fail miserably. It's my show alright. The show is never anything but how I want it to be.
My singers are the cream of the crop. I make them want to come because I can make them sound like professionals. My shows will rival any as far as the talent level and the professionalism. My shows are a pleasure to listen to all night long.
I will never be able to make 100% of the crowd totally happy 100% of the time. I don't even try because it's impossible whenever you have someone that thinks the entire world is against them. Just like I'll never have every song someone wants to sing. I don't try because that is impossible mostly from a money aspect. 40,000 song would cost somewhere between $80-100,000 dollars.
So take me or leave me.
There are KJs out there that will take every complainer they can get. They need the warm bodies and I need the room for people that enjoy and respect what I can do.
Gregory, Back to the answer to your original question....because we can.